Why God CANNOT Kill Satan Or Fallen Angels

Moderator: Juniper

Post Reply
User avatar
High Spy
Marshmallow
Posts: 645

Why God CANNOT Kill Satan Or Fallen Angels

Post by High Spy »

https://discussmormonism.com/viewtopic. ... 6#p2869406
bill4long wrote: Thu Jun 20, 2024 3:37 am
Dr. Shades wrote: Thu May 23, 2024 2:32 pm Because Pi means something, whereas 5/20 means nothing.

No, it is the number of a man.

666 is the number of the beast. It is not the devil.

More meaningless tripe.
I like to point out that "the devil", in the Hebrew Bible as an enemy to the Creator, doesn't exist.

Satan as an "arch enemy of God" came to exist in the intertestement period. 1 Enoch for example. Read it and see how rational it is (not.)

As for "Lucifer" in Isaiah 14. Gawd, how ridiculous. "Lucifer" was a cognate of Latin and means "light bringer." But in Hebrew the name is "heylel" which was the name of the planet Venus. The topic in the chapter is obviously, and explicitly, against the King of Babylon. Looking at the attributes of this king in the chapter, you'd have to be a complete idiot to think this refers to a "fallen angel who opposes God". Etc.

Thank you, Roman Catholic church, for propagating such loony bull****.


This video =~Why God CANNOT Kill Satan Or Fallen Angels supplies an explanation more verbose than any other that I am aware of. It seems pretty good; what do y’all think. :?:

ET phone home. :lol:

The Wicker Man
Marshmallow
Posts: 238

Post by The Wicker Man »

High Spy wrote: Sat Jul 20, 2024 9:35 am https://discussmormonism.com/viewtopic. ... 6#p2869406
bill4long wrote: Thu Jun 20, 2024 3:37 am
Dr. Shades wrote: Thu May 23, 2024 2:32 pm Because Pi means something, whereas 5/20 means nothing.

No, it is the number of a man.

666 is the number of the beast. It is not the devil.

More meaningless tripe.
I like to point out that "the devil", in the Hebrew Bible as an enemy to the Creator, doesn't exist.

Satan as an "arch enemy of God" came to exist in the intertestement period. 1 Enoch for example. Read it and see how rational it is (not.)

As for "Lucifer" in Isaiah 14. Gawd, how ridiculous. "Lucifer" was a cognate of Latin and means "light bringer." But in Hebrew the name is "heylel" which was the name of the planet Venus. The topic in the chapter is obviously, and explicitly, against the King of Babylon. Looking at the attributes of this king in the chapter, you'd have to be a complete idiot to think this refers to a "fallen angel who opposes God". Etc.

Thank you, Roman Catholic church, for propagating such loony bull****.


This video =~Why God CANNOT Kill Satan Or Fallen Angels supplies an explanation more verbose than any other that I am aware of. It seems pretty good; what do y’all think. :?:

ET phone home. :lol:
Rather good but not perfect. If God is giving Satan to the very last moment to repent and be saved then what about the other fallen angels. They were cast into the lake of fire (hell). However the lake of fire was made into this creation. When this creation dissolves it will return to (being) the lake of fire. It is this world and possibly many more that the fallen angels were cast down to. And the chains that bind them is our mortal bodies. That means that humans are most likely the fallen angels. And this world(s) is their way back to God.

Post Reply