and it’s advent on the inter webs. 
Wow a sign for the Spirit supposedly created from not so innocent back and forth teasing on LDSFF even has an apparent signature supplied by god. Who would of thought? And as a symbol it is the perfect representation of the DS as the dot can represent the human and the vertical bar the Spirit. Amazing! P.S. and what about the notion of the baseball player wielding the bat. Another perfect representation.Finrock wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 1:42 pm "Unicode Character “” (U+2757)
https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+2757
Truth is stranger than fiction and I can relate to the meaning of nefarious.The Wicker Man wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 7:58 pmWow a sign for the Spirit supposedly created from not so innocent back and forth teasing on LDSFF even has an apparent signature supplied by god. Who would of thought? And as a symbol it is the perfect representation of the DS as the dot can represent the human and the vertical bar the Spirit. Amazing! P.S. and what about the notion of the baseball player wielding the bat. Another perfect representation.Finrock wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 1:42 pm "Unicode Character “
https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+2757
BND if you read this you should let the Nazi's at the LDS Faciest Forum be aware of this. Search for "scarlet thread" and you might be able to find the OP. I can't quite remember the name of the poster that started it but the name started with 'mal' I think and had an 'h' and 'oids' or something like that.
Prolly the bottom link but top looks interesting too.Juniper wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 7:10 am https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... d#p1339457
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... d#p1346895
. . . . . . . . One has to be a member to see the second link. A better search term might be The Scarlet Thread Society.Juniper wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 7:13 amProlly the bottom link but top looks interesting too.Juniper wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 7:10 am https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... d#p1339457
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... d#p1346895
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=71437
The Wicker Man wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 9:24 am One has to be a member to see the second link. A better search term might be The Scarlet Thread Society.
The red exclamation point club was the title of the thread. No other thread looked of interest. Do you wish to see more?Michael Sherwin wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2019 7:19 pm
The red exclamation point club - Re: Heads but not Tails
The first official teaching of The Scarlet Remnant Society by society president, Michael Sherwin.
HEADS AND TAILS
1Corinthians 15:12 Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead?
TAILS BUT NOT HEADS
1Corinthians 15:13 But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen:
1Corinthians 15:14 And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain.
1Corinthians 15:15 Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God; because we have testified of God that he raised up Christ: whom he raised not up, if so be that the dead rise not.
1Corinthians 15:16 For if the dead rise not, then is not Christ raised:
1Corinthians 15:17 And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.
1Corinthians 15:18 Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.
1Corinthians 15:19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.
HEADS BUT NOT TAILS
1Corinthians 15:20 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept.
1Corinthians 15:21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.
1Corinthians 15:22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
1Corinthians 15:23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming.
1Corinthians 15:24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
1Corinthians 15:25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
1Corinthians 15:26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
1Corinthians 15:27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
1Corinthians 15:28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
TAILS BUT NOT HEADS
1Corinthians 15:29 Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?
1Corinthians 15:30 And why stand we in jeopardy every hour?
If Christ be not risen we are all dead men walking. If the dead rise not at all why are they, the dead men walking, then baptized for a dead Christ. This should not be taken out of context. The context for 15:29 & 30 is the "Else" and the "Else" is Jesus did not rise from the dead. If Jesus did not rise from the dead then there is no such thing as baptism. So why bother being baptised for a dead Christ. It has nothing to do with baptizing actual dead people. It refers back to TAILS BUT NOT HEADS where Jesus is supposed to be as dead as a doornail. That is not reality and therefore 15:29 is not part of reality. It is part of the unreality. Unreality but not reality.
High Spy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 6:29 amTruth is stranger than fiction and I can relate to the meaning of nefarious.The Wicker Man wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 7:58 pmWow a sign for the Spirit supposedly created from not so innocent back and forth teasing on LDSFF even has an apparent signature supplied by god. Who would of thought? And as a symbol it is the perfect representation of the DS as the dot can represent the human and the vertical bar the Spirit. Amazing! P.S. and what about the notion of the baseball player wielding the bat. Another perfect representation.Finrock wrote: ↑Mon Mar 20, 2023 1:42 pm "Unicode Character “
https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+2757
BND if you read this you should let the Nazi's at the LDS Faciest Forum be aware of this. Search for "scarlet thread" and you might be able to find the OP. I can't quite remember the name of the poster that started it but the name started with 'mal' I think and had an 'h' and 'oids' or something like that.
Likely the worst atrocities go unspoken, just as the greatest truths often go unseen.
Is my latest words there.
The search function there too has been greatly diminished for anyone not a member. This impedes the ability of good people everywhere to investigate inspired truth, all to better serve the god of mammon. Most words there apparently are not valued to the extent needed to maximize availability. This travesty must not stand, because it fills me with an urge to dedicate. This Will Not Do.
Alaris wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:31 pmKingdom of ZION wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:33 pmWhat really stands out to me is the Twins Types:alaris wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2018 3:58 am
"Firstborn" is rarely, if ever, the "first born." Almost any prophet you can think of who has his family documented is a younger brother. The birthright from Adam reflects the same, for those cases where birth order is documented. The Lord Himself is the exception and even then he wasn't the first born to Joseph and Mary, though He was Mary's first born. Almost like His birth was out of turn as well!
Seth, Moses, Shem (supposedly there's evidence Shem was the second born,) Isaac, Joseph, Ephraim, Andrew / Peter, Nephi, Joseph / Hyrum, etc. etc. The fact that Isaac, Joseph, Ephraim all received the birthright "out of turn" is certainly a heavenly clue that by no means diminishes Ephraim's birthright.
I believe part of this is deference to the Lord, but the greater symbol here is that nobody receives a heavenly birthright by age or by order of birth - only by earning the birthright. The Lord naming Ephraim firstborn in Jeremiah 31 is certainly telling. Why would the Lord be born by a non-birthright tribe if it isn't the least of the tribes? Some random middle tribe?
Of course there is the symbolism of eternal rounds and how one earns firstborn (D&C 93) rather than being blessed by happenstance. "You were the first spirit born. Congratulations. You will never sin ever because you will have to be innocent to atone for everyone else."
Messiah and Lucifer
Abel and Cain
Issac and Ishmael
The struggle for birthright or covenant blessings.
Jacob and Esau
Genesis 25:24 ¶ And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb.
25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.
26 And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau’s heel; and his name was called Jacob: and Isaac was threescore years old when she bare them.
Judah's offspring twins Zarah and Pharez through his union with his daughter-in-law Tamar after his sons Er and Onah were slain by the Lord.
Genesis 38:27 ¶ And it came to pass in the time of her travail, that, behold, twins were in her womb.
28 And it came to pass, when she travailed, that the one put out his hand: and the midwife took and bound upon his hand a scarlet thread, saying, This came out first.
29 And it came to pass, as he drew back his hand, that, behold, his brother came out: and she said, How hast thou broken forth? this breach be upon thee: therefore his name was called Pharez.
30 And afterward came out his brother, that had the scarlet thread upon his hand: and his name was called Zarah.
Matthew 1:3 indicates the birthright passed through Pharez, though the scarlet thread was placed on the hand that breached first. So even here you have an out-of-order twins situation. Judah had three sons, the eldest of which was Er. The law that required brothers to marry their dead brother's widow came into effect when the second son, Onan married her. Onan famously had some aiming issues which angered the Lord who slew him.
Judah thought Tamar was a harlot by the way she was dressed which is how he accidentally passed the birthright along through his own daughter-in-law. It's all very convoluted and interesting. Judah thought Tamar was cursed and was hesitant to give his third son Shelah to her. Pharez obviously wasn't even the first born to Judah as Shelah survived and had children of his own. Yet the birthright passed through Pharez.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelah_(son_of_Judah)
Silver Pie wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 7:32 pm Maybe go to the members list, find the Ms, and see if something shows up that matches The Wicker Man's memory? You have to be logged in to see the members list over there.
