blitzinstripes wrote: Sun Jan 29, 2023 1:29 am
You are such a weird dude, BND.
Weird, but not Bizarre was EQ’s partial match that likely meant nothing. 8
This March 8, will likely be just another ordinary day at the memorial.
So it goes.
Was March 8, 2010, a day of any significant importance?
endlessQuestions wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 12:23 am
Using John's models...
That day was 13 Wind on the Sacred Round, which is a red (major) holy day
17 Sagittarius on the Uniform Star Calendar, a blue (minor) holy day
and the day
25 Kislev on the Uniform Hebrew Calendar, also a blue (minor) holy day
For my own part, this came to mind a couple of weeks ago, and something made me think that was the day the seventh seal opened. The conclusion of my photo at march8miracle.org was the year 2010. The Wicker Man posted that based on the Bible that 2010 is when the seventh seal opened. March 8 is another representation of Christ’s name, so any March 8 is worthy of observance. Maybe that was my reasoning two weeks ago. A 5.7 magnitude earthquake landed Moroni’s Instrument on March 18th 2020, which is 10 years and 10 days after March 8, 2010.
There is my text at the FF, and a video for context that came out, when I was living in me fort on First Avenue in SLC. Really it was called the Brigham Apartments, and the walls were over a foot thick. I could see his old barn out my back window that had been converted to apartments too. This was just after receiving my Patriarchal Blessing after sitting in church with ETB on his birthday. Ordinary days that were extraordinary.
For my own part, this came to mind a couple of weeks ago, and something made me think that was the day the seventh seal opened. The conclusion of my photo at march8miracle.org was the year 2010. The Wicker Man posted that based on the Bible that 2010 is when the seventh seal opened. March 8 is another representation of Christ’s name, so any March 8 is worthy of observance. Maybe that was my reasoning two weeks ago. A 5.7 magnitude earthquake landed Moroni’s Instrument on March 18th 2020, which is 10 years and 10 days after March 8, 2010.
There is my text at the FF, and a video for context that came out, when I was living in me fort on First Avenue in SLC. Really it was called the Brigham Apartments, and the walls were over a foot thick. I could see his old barn out my back window that had been converted to apartments too. This was just after receiving my Patriarchal Blessing after sitting in church with ETB on his birthday. Ordinary days that were extraordinary.
For some reason when I was a kid the females in my family were all in to Duran Duran.
I thought they were ridiculous back then when I was like 7 years old.
...
Re: Was March 8, 2010, a day of any significant importance?
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2023 4:03 pm
by The Wicker Man
I'm not a person of great personal volition. When the Spirit moves me I move and I do what the Spirit moves me to do. I may wield the Spirit like a baseball bat but it is the Spirit that has me move my arm. The Spirit has said nothing concerning March 8th 2010. Sorry.
Ordinary World
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2023 6:02 am
by High Spy
Valo wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 4:16 am
For some reason when I was a kid the females in my family were all in to Duran Duran.
I thought they were ridiculous back then when I was like 7 years old.
...
Ordinary World came out when my extraordinary endeavors fell flat. On our first date my current wife and I assembled a first ever magic lamp as per https://patents.google.com/patent/US5473525A/en.
There me First Avenue address and my spy type name may also be seen to be factual in nature. For a time it seemed the concept embodied as a Magic Christmas Tree Ornament was moving into the marketplace in a big way. But then Underwriters Laboratories killed it.
Soon thereafter we went to OKC where I attended class with who I would go on to refer as me nameless friend. On one freezing cold morning, I shared said song, and he was surprised that such an awesome song existed. He later gave us one of his Christmas CDs that he enjoyed making. First Avenue is where I lived when on ETBs birthday, I attended sacrament meeting with him, then received my patriarchal blessing.
Valo wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 4:16 am
For some reason when I was a kid the females in my family were all in to Duran Duran.
I thought they were ridiculous back then when I was like 7 years old.
...
Ordinary World came out when my extraordinary endeavors fell flat. On our first date my current wife and I assembled a first ever magic lamp as per https://patents.google.com/patent/US5473525A/en.
There me First Avenue address and my spy type name may also be seen to be factual in nature. For a time it seemed the concept embodied as a Magic Christmas Tree Ornament was moving into the marketplace in a big way. But then Underwriters Laboratories killed it.
Soon thereafter we went to OKC where I attended class with who I would go on to refer as me nameless friend. On one freezing cold morning, I shared said song, and he was surprised that such an awesome song existed. He later gave us one of his Christmas CDs that he enjoyed making. First Avenue is where I lived when on ETBs birthday, I attended sacrament meeting with him, then received my patriarchal blessing.
Very cool. Thanks for those clarifications.
...
Re: SwOrdinary World
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 4:30 am
by BeNotDeceived
Finrock wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 3:08 pm
Very cool. Thanks for those clarifications.
...
Very Cool was a favorite animation on GLP.
Jesus came as a sword, which is like a metal bat that’s been sharpened by the word of God, and is The Word of God. The SVB failure began the evening (1800?) on 3/8 being the first day of a short season said succinctly as March8-18.
. . . * . . . . . . . . **
Re: Was March 8, 2010, a day of any significant importance?
My percentage of all posts on LDSFF dropped to 0.66, but my post rate is still 2.01.
Sometimes the scriptures will say the Lord forbids me to write something. How the Lord communicates this isn’t specific spelled out. How the wisemen knew stuff also isn’t exactly spelled out, but here is something to go on. Both indicators are biblical. Anyways, March 8 is when the bank failures began in 2023. It will be interesting to see the reaction to posts when said indicators allow.
Re: Was March 8, 2010, a day of any significant importance?
2.01 post rate may drop in 6 hours, or it may not, but 5:55am local is when change may be expected
Calculating percentage of all posts was easy, but that can change at any time.
Those are some observed and understood behaviors.
Compare and Contrast.
Most won’t.
Preferring delusion.
Anyways, that’s me two cents about posting me two cents.
Re: Was March 8, 2010, a day of any significant importance?
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:26 am
by BeNotDeceived
Dear mcmOE,
Please pen your thoughts regarding info below finely formatted in HTML and phpBB for bog post …
— (prolly … probably)
Plus explanation as per “the” is built into “Christ” meaning saying “the Christ” is redundant.
Luke wrote:
Robin Hood wrote:
Huh?
Meaning probably.
John Tavner wrote:
I think, and I could be wrong (about “the”), but I’m pretty sure Christ means “the anointed one” (including “the”).
So Jesus Christ means “Jesus the anointed one.”
Jesus the Christ means “Jesus the the anointed one.”
Note:
“The” is already built into “Christ” — making “Jesus the Christ” technically redundant, but not without poetic or sacred resonance. Some phrases break the rules because they carry the weight of wonder.
⸻
Let me know if you’d like a compact version for QR code landing pages or printed artifact backstory tags. The lore, she liveth.
— indeed it do with four March Miracles at last count.
Re: Was March 8, 2010, a day of any significant importance?
Jamescm wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 5:53 pm
I need careful and specific definitions of "being a member of a Church" and "Salvation".
Being a member (of a Church): Accepting the core tenants of a religious body and receiving relevant rights of initiation. In other words, being baptized.
Salvation: "Moving to a state that is considered ideal to adherents of a religious body. In other words, being a joint-heir with Christ.
Going off of this, yes, I believe we must be members of some Church or other body that is sanctioned by Jesus Christ in order to receive Salvation.
Jamescm wrote: Thu Jul 24, 2025 5:53 pm
Going off of this, yes, I believe we must be members of some Church or other body that is sanctioned by Jesus Christ in order to receive Salvation.
Michael Sherwin, servant and chess-trained seer, offered a clearer light than creedal fog. He taught: “You may be surprised to learn Christ did not name the Church after himself, but after the thing it must become.”[^1]
The scriptures do not require a church to be named after Jesus — rather, that the works done therein be in His name, that is, in His power, and not merely about Him.
3 Nephi 27:7–9 — “Therefore, whatsoever ye shall do, ye shall do it in my name… if it be called in my name then it is my church, if it so be that they are built upon my gospel.”
But that verse also includes a profound qualifier:
“And if it so be that the church is built upon my gospel then will the Father show forth his own works in it.”
So the name alone is insufficient.
A false church can call itself after Christ and yet deny His power (cf. 2 Tim 3:5). A true gathering may not bear His name on the sign, but still receive His seal through the Spirit.
What then is the “Church of the Firstborn”? The heavenly register (Hebrews 12:23). Sherwin asserted that membership there comes not through man, but “by being sealed up unto eternal life by the Holy Spirit of promise”[^2].
If your name is written there, then it matters not what is written on the steeple down here.
As Sherwin once mused:
“God will sanctify whom He chooses. The ordinance is important, but it is the inward transformation that makes it real — else you are just wet.”
So must a church bear the name of Christ to save?
Only if Christ is truly within it.
And if He is, the name will be written on their foreheads, not just their marquees (Rev. 14:1).
[^1]: Paraphrased from teachings found via Slog Bog and Sherwin’s scriptural expositions.
[^2]: See also D&C 76:68–69 regarding the Church of the Firstborn.