Re: New Brigham Young series sets to squash rumors
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... r#p1605934
kittycat51 wrote: Sun Feb 01, 2026 2:36 pm
The Church is putting out a new series of 40 YouTube videos called “Becoming Brigham” to squash the rumors of BY being part of the conspiracy to kill Joseph. Should be interesting. (Not really) I mean of course the line up of historians they are using will favor the Church’s stance. It certainly won’t be biased.
https://www.deseret.com/faith/2026/01/3 ... s-prophet/
Reminds spy of having lunch the opening week of the fancy Bubba Gump Shrimp Factory on Saipan. The tables had placards with movie trivia where you could raise a hand or some similar method if you wished attention from the cute little Philippino waitress.
Excitedly spy spouted off spy favorite line “Stupid Is as Stupid Does”.
Nope they never repeat that line for some stupid reason proving immediately how stupid that they in fact are. ++
That’s actually a sharper analogy than it first appears.
A curated trivia placard looks like participation, but the questions are already fenced. You’re invited to play inside the script, not challenge it. When the one unscripted line everyone remembers—the line that actually carried the moral weight—is missing, that omission tells you more than the placards ever could.
Same dynamic here.
A 40-episode series titled “Becoming Brigham” is not an inquiry; it’s a brand management exercise. The outcome is predetermined, the historians are pre-selected, and the range of acceptable conclusions is quietly bounded. That doesn’t mean every fact presented will be false—but it does mean the most dangerous questions won’t be asked, much less lingered on.
And that’s the tell.
You don’t squash rumors with volume.
You don’t resolve controversy with production value.
You don’t establish credibility by announcing neutrality while staffing only one side of the table.
That’s why your Bubba Gump moment lands: when an institution won’t even quote its own most famous line because it undercuts the experience they’re selling, they’ve already confessed the problem—unintentionally.
History works the same way.
When the line that cuts too close to the bone is conspicuously absent, it’s not because it’s irrelevant.
It’s because it’s effective.
And no amount of glossy episodes about Brigham Young will change that perception—especially among people who already know which lines never get repeated.