[Verse 1:] Out here in the fields, I fight for my meals I get my back into my living I don’t need to fight to prove I’m right I don’t need to be forgiven, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, ye-ah
[Interlude:] Don’t cry, don’t raise your eye It’s only teenage wasteland
[Verse 2:] Sally, take my hand, we’ll travel south 'cross land Put out the fire and don’t look past my shoulder The exodus is here, the happy ones are near Let’s get together before we get much older
[Chorus:] Teenage wasteland, it’s only teenage wasteland Teenage wasteland, oh, yeah Teenage wasteland, they’re all wasted!
BeNotDeceived wrote: Wed Sep 23, 2026 5:37 am
He nor anyone has addressed spy 3.5 demonstration earthquakes posted here with timestamped seismic records.
Yeah sorry I don't understand you. You operate on a different wavelength than me and dare I say most people.
Grok spun 3.5 demoquakes to mean multitudes of 3.5 magnitude quakes, when really spy was emulating old surveys saying the average family had 2.5 kids. Often common information like that becomes obscure.
1. Clint Eastwood played a character that always responded “my gun” when shown ink blobs. Spy was unable to find this scene on youtube.
2. David Byrne interview, he said he smacks his head imitating TV preachers who dramatically smack parishioners supposedly healing them of their afflictions.
Anyway DQ01-04 were quakes invited by The Wicker Man to complete an 888 geometric progression. DQ04-07 quakes happened on the 38th and final day of my posted poll. DQ01 showed unique keyword Crist timing pattern which built on previous examples of this pattern stretching back to March Eighth 1980. DQ02 shook my son on his birthday. Seismic links of all seven demos are posted on LDSFF.
Space Trucking or Teenage Wasteland also point to “the exodus is here”.
Here could mean a time and/or a place, even a virtual place.
Requested help appears on the horizon in multiple ways.
Mindfields wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2026 12:29 pm
Let's say God speaks to you. Real or imagined, doesn't matter. Since God's supposedly speaking to you, you record it and share it with others. Would you only record and share what God directly told you or would you add your own speculations? If God really was talking to you and you started speculating wouldn't God tell you to knock it off? If it's all imaginary then speculation seems inevitable.
I don't like the idea that I'm required to believe in someone else's experiences. If God really wants us to understand a concept then he himself should make it known to everyone. Joseph's spirtual experiences, real or imagined, were his alone. I can choose to believe them but I'm not required to believe them.
In my mind, the idea of the Holy Ghost confirming truth is fraught with uncertainty and is therefore unreliable.
Gobstopper Grok, please peruse TWM posts at slog bog and Michael Sherwin’s posts where “the exodus is here” and provide a simple explanation. ++
The 1844 Doctrine and Covenants (D&C) was the second edition of that book of scripture (after the 1835 Kirtland edition). It was prepared under Joseph Smith’s direction in Nauvoo as essentially a reprint of the 1835 content, with the addition of eight new items/sections that had not been in the earlier edition.
Those additions (in modern numbering) include sections such as 103, 105, 112, 119, 124, 127, 128, and 135. Section 135 is the account of the martyrdom of Joseph and Hyrum Smith (written after their deaths on June 27, 1844). Printing was underway or nearly complete when Joseph died; the volume was finished and made available later in 1844 under the direction of remaining Church leaders (notably involving John Taylor as printer). Its purpose was practical and scriptural: to supply the growing Church with an updated, authoritative collection of the revelations Joseph had selected for inclusion, meeting demand for the book amid rapid growth and missionary work. It was not a wholesale doctrinal overhaul; later editions (especially 1876) added many more sections drawn from journals, letters, sermons, etc., that were not part of the 1844 selection.
On the Mindfields quote and the request about TWM / slogbog / Michael Sherwin “the exodus is here”
The quoted post expresses a common skeptical stance: personal spiritual experiences (Joseph’s or anyone else’s) are private and not binding on others; the Holy Ghost as a confirmatory mechanism feels subjective and unreliable; if God wants something known, it should be direct and universal rather than mediated through one person’s record or speculation.
TWM posts on slogbog.com and Michael Sherwin’s related posts (both appear in the same small, independent LDS-adjacent discussion forums that overlap with LDS Freedom Forum circles) center on fringe/end-times interpretive claims common in those spaces. In short:
• TWM is treated in those threads as a hidden or preparatory figure tied to “Davidic Servant” ideas (a prophetic role drawn from certain readings of Isaiah, etc., sometimes linked to a future leader or restorer who remains concealed until a specific time). Posts describe TWM as still “hidden” until God chooses to reveal or “release” that role, often with numerical patterns, earthquake “witnesses,” or scriptural allusions.
• Michael Sherwin (who posts under that name and sometimes “The Wickerman”) shares highly personal accounts of lifelong spiritual communications, parallel-timeline memories, protective experiences, name/number encodings, and self-reflective speculation about possible roles in end-times scenarios (including temporary “DS candidate” language he later walked back in places). He also posts everyday material (bike rides, etc.) on slogbog.
• “The exodus is here” (or similar phrasing in related discussions) refers to an anticipated sudden, miraculous gathering or removal of a righteous remnant—drawn from JST Luke 17, Isaiah imagery of a new exodus out of “Babylon,” eagles/angels gathering the saints in one night/day, and Zion being “born in a day.” In these posts it is treated as imminent or already beginning in a spiritual/preparatory sense rather than a literal historical reenactment.
These are private interpretive and experiential claims circulating in small online discussion spaces. They are not official Church doctrine, not part of the standard works, and not required belief for anyone. They function much like the personal experiences the Mindfields post is questioning: real or imagined to the individuals involved, recorded and shared by them, open to individual evaluation (or dismissal) via whatever standard of evidence or spiritual confirmation a person accepts. No one is required to accept them.
One said word pair and url is marred so you’ll need to go the extra mile to discover it. Also see trailhead march8miracle.org where Crist timing pattern is explicitly posted for all sincere seekers of truth to see.
Fred wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2026 3:39 pm
We all have good ideas from time to time. Something that we have never thought about before. Our brain fetched it, but from where? All of our brains have the capability of pondering a problem and asking what if. If this brainchild occurred after a prayer, it may be considered an answer to the prayer. The idea did come from somewhere. Of course, if the spirit of God dwells with us, our brain did not have to search very far.
Four demonstration earthquakes became seven.
The Purple Circle represents an achievable public good.
“By small and simple acts, great things are brought to pass”.
Why two six point twos preceding a five point seven on the 38th and final day of a poll.
“First” may mean forerunner born in 1962 and two occurrences may be seen as a hint to request a double portion as others have done. Also Peter was sent on a specific fishing quest … ++ Grok thoughts …
The quote from Fred on the LDS Freedom Forum thread is a thoughtful reflection on the origin of ideas: the brain’s capacity for novel thought (“what if”), the possibility that prayer invites answers, and the role of the Spirit when it dwells with a person. It also correctly notes the difficulty of distinguishing sources—divine, personal cognition, or otherwise—and that not every good idea is revelation.
Your subsequent points appear to connect that discussion to a longer interpretive framework you’ve developed around seismic events as “demonstration” signs:
• The shift from four to seven demonstration earthquakes.
• The “Purple Circle” framed as an achievable public good.
• The principle that small and simple acts (such as posting a poll) can lead to greater outcomes.
• The specific sequence of two magnitude 6.2 events preceding a 5.7 on the final (38th) day of a poll.
• Symbolic readings of “First” as a forerunner associated with a 1962 birth year, the request for a double portion, and the parallel to Peter being directed on a particular fishing task.
These elements sit within a pattern of discussion that has appeared on the same forum for years—linking personal spiritual impressions, numerical patterns, timing relative to polls or dates, and real-world earthquake catalogs as confirmatory signs.
From a purely observational standpoint:
• Earthquakes of those magnitudes occur regularly along active plate boundaries (Ring of Fire and elsewhere). Clustering can happen through normal tectonic stress transfer, aftershock sequences, or statistical coincidence.
• Polls and public posts are ordinary human actions; any subsequent seismic events remain subject to the same geological processes regardless of the poll’s existence.
• Symbolic or typological readings (forerunner, double portion, fishing quest) are personal interpretive layers. They can be meaningful within a faith framework while remaining outside the domain of empirical verification.
If the intent of the post is to illustrate how a “good idea” (the original poll or the interpretive pattern) can feel elevated into something more revelatory through subsequent events and reflection, that tracks with the thread’s theme. Small, concrete acts—posting, observing, connecting dots—can indeed accumulate into larger perceived patterns for the person doing the work.
What would you like to explore further here? Clarification of the sequence of the seven demonstration events, the specific meaning you assign to the Purple Circle, how the 1962 / double-portion / Peter elements fit, or something else?
