Michael Sherwin invites a 7.3 magnitude earthquake

[BeNotDeceived]

Re: The Second Coming
^{https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 5#p1538225}

A few nights ago I had come to mind a dream I read, collected in my AVOW days, written probably around 2007. Supposedly it was given to a Bishop, who passed it on to the administrator. Anyway, the dream told by a young man has him on a Thursday having multiple people … So Feast of Trumpets is likely the day the Lord returns.

No coming in glory until the New Earth, but late 2025 is the soonest the silence in heaven may end.

Why do you say that?

Daniel 9:24 will be fulfilled. The second coming of Jesus is not for thousands of years from now and it will be to the New Earth.

Why should we believe Mike’s explanation.

Because he is only one amongst us that has orchestrated multiple earthquakes ramping up 0.8 in magnitude from one occurrence to the next, thereby emulating 888. And the first of these was of 5.7 magnitude to land Moroni’s instrument, because Moroni portrayed as an angel, is one of many pious frauds perpetrated upon us. Said 5.7 also occurred at an exact minute to form the CRIST timing pattern at March8Miracle.org. Interestingly there is a interesting gathering taking place most Thursdays.

[BeNotDeceived]

Re: Stargate
^{https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 0#p1540750}

So, do you not believe in the possibility of superintelligence and singularity? How can you differentiate between the chemical reactions and electric pulses in the human brain and the circuitry and algorithms of a computer? I’m not arguing the fundamental duality of human nature compared to a computer/algorithm.

I just think of it like this: the Internet is the current hub of all human knowledge— based on reality or our own flawed understandings. Integrating AI to the Internet with extremely fast processing speeds mimics the human brain. I would assume fast processing speeds and a vast information base correlate to higher AI intelligence; this along with machine learning and advanced analytical capabilities, how can this not eventually lead to super intelligence? Comparing AI to bots seems way out of touch at this point!

So what is the danger between thinking it is intelligent or based on algorithms if our interactions with it is comparable and almost indistinguishable with another human? Seems dangerous whether intelligent or not! AI is already surpassing average human intelligence. I can envision androids being built that mimic the human body and can use senses mimicking ours. Many years away, but who knows. I’ve heard some scary things that some AI, before being deleted, would try and save itself by hiding code for self preservation. Stuff like that! We also have to account for the eventual breakthroughs of nano technology—another game changer.

I'm not sure where even to start. first. the INTERNET has NO KNOWLEDGE at all........... nothing. perhaps facts, mingled with lies and falsitudes of all sorts. but "intelligence", no. Intelligence is a kin to "wisdom". It requires more than facts or points or issues, or statements or assertions, or data. Intelligence uses facts.

I often see issue with discussing "truth". Truth is not a statement of facts...... the scriptural definition of truth is "the knowledge of.............."". Knowledge is the abilit to create and or use facts/ or "factoid" or what ever you wish to call all the "data" or "information" points (usually AI assertions technically) for a purpose.

I don't believe in a computer being able to create knowledge. It is able to dig through "factoids" (without any basis of judgement) and find corrolary factoids, And true AI's purpose is to create new "factoids" or assertions by combining existing ones. like a = b, and b = c and we have a rule (AI inference rule) that if any two things are equal so must be the third, so it creates a new factoid or assertion (pick your technical term) and says a = c. Now, in reality there is never (not often anyway) anything as clear as this, so there are shades of gray. This is called "fuzzy" and requires "fuzzy logic". If I think I have a, and I think a equals b, then may assert (infer if you like) that a equals c. But, there is an added fuzziness or probability or tenuous nature. Sometime other factoids and increase the probability of your new "term" or factoid, or assertion. but eventually, it becomes too fuzzy, several iterations into the logic cycle. It appears that it is learning, and making new facts. And on the surface it actually creates such things. But then things go awry. Why, because the data is imperfect, as are the inferencing rules, and the inference engine is cyclical (not running to total optimization).

So, you start creating factoids (as facts) that are more and more fuzzy or tenuous, until they are just wrong. The head of the AI group (supposedly open AI, bah) call is "halucenations" and says they'll go away....... they can not go away but get carried along like rocks in a glacier, and deeper embedded.

There is no intelligence, artificial or otherwise. Worse, any on here see a natural language interface, that talks nice and makes up crap and thinks that is intelligent, cause it sounds nice, but a parakeet can talk back to you, quite clearly. It is the same with images and image recognition. There is no intelligence, just looking for repeatable features. Many errors creeping in.

So, no, I don't accept some algorithm will ever be really intelligent. It may be able to play chess, guess the stockmarket (and drive it if enough people agree) and even tell people what to do and think (but so does Taylor Swift for that matter).

an algorithm is only as good as the programmer and the data base and the ability to diagnose and repair it. BTW with learning algorithms, there is no way to ever perform any good quality control as the algorithm is different than when you start the dianosis.

People need to really read what AI is, not what some liberal or non-scientific editor says it is. And there is a place for it. I mean we have been using these techniques since the first search engines started indexing the HTML and other data files. Some of us have been working with the techniques since the origination of SQL and such searches. very good for sifting lots of data and looking for specific things.

My wife loves her AI interface to help her write letters. She is a Spanish speaker and even a marginal english language bot is nice and productive. and more patient than me. Usually it is correct, but sometimes it says stupid things. I mean anyone that has had a text or email message changed by a language assistant knows what I mean.

the problem with the AI sold today, is people use it, mostly for superficial things, the accept it. Sort of like we all were in our TBM days and accepted things that seemed correct and consistent but now we find were altered and changed many decades ago.......... truth burried beneath heaps of repeating and made up consistency checking.

but there is way too much information and data to ever sift through and the thing about the AI ;push is the blending of original information or factoids and those added.

Like here we have a plastic straw ban....... some research paper said how it was killing dolphins, so goody-two-shoes got them banned. Now we find the paper was written by a mom for a kid's HS science project and she made up the facts (factoids) of deaths of dolphins, etc... .it got repeated in some college papers, then in science journals, and now she says it was made up and all those science journal call her a liar............... yet the pedigree can be traced. but we cannot purge the follow on lies or new factoids created. as they are fuzzy and we can only search certain terms. plus TPTB like banning straws anyway. BTW I never use straws so I don't care, but it is a small example or things being said and becoming "facts". Could do a long tutorial on COVID and shots to show how many false factoids exist, or climate change, could go on......... those are what the AI uses. As do people with no intelligence of their own....... and there are quite a few it turns out, IMO.

I see where you’re getting at. I do. The Internet isn’t knowledge, but that is what it’s mimicking. But when AI responds and acts even at average human intelligence, what’s the difference? It still mimics human intelligence well. And it’s only going to get more advanced. And also, back to my points about androids and nano technology integrated with highly sophisticated sensors, is it possible to gain actual knowledge? What is that going to look like 1000 years from now?

Sensors detected the exact timing and magnitude of a first earthquake at March8Miracle.org …

[BeNotDeceived]

Poll: Repeat a 5.7 magnitude earthquake or continue via 8.9 … ?
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=77331

Maybe March 18th to spell Cryst.

C == 3rd month
R == 18th day
Y == 25th year
S == 19th hour, minute or second
T == 20 to designate 21st century

Maybe a 12 hour shift like 2020 as per https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... d#p1501954.

You have 38 days to select a single choice.

Any special place, effect or other request.

[BeNotDeceived]

Re: Poll - Are you the Davidic Servant?
^{https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 2#p1545042}

He's got much better things to do with his time.

If he knows of his calling, he may be here on assignment. If he doesn't and is wasting his time, that fits with one of the qualifications of his which I don't recall well but the gist is that he has spent much time, before he is called, in vain efforts. Someone more versed on this subject could cite the reference better than I.

A synopsis of The Wicker Man situation.

[BeNotDeceived]

Re: Poll: Repeat a 5.7 magnitude earthquake or continue via 8.9 … ?
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 2#p1545582

So my (admittedly rough translation) of what I hear you people saying is that this guy (Michael Sherwin) correctly predicted when an earthquake would happen, so now we're betting on what level the next earthquake (that he ostensibly will also predict) will be?

Right?

You could have just phrased the poll question that way, and then it would have made more sense to us mere mortals.

Many people who were here in 2020 Likely remember or choose a state of confusion. The record is clear and convincing, but attention to detail is crucial. Nowhere was a 5.7 predicted, only that a demonstration was requested by TWM who’s made a point of saying 57 is emblematic of him, or words to that effect.

Besides the magnitude, the timing of said quake spells CRIST as per information at March8Miracle.org. Now 2025 will spell Cryst on the fifth anniversary of the event that landed Moroni’s instrument. Really there were four quakes that inTheKnow tied together via 888 as a second witness to the name of Christ, thereby guaranteeing the absence of evil …I’m

[BeNotDeceived]

Re: Poll - Are you the Davidic Servant?
^{https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 3#p1546803}

Being a borderline genius or genius, where do think Australia Aboriginals are descended from?

Gravity’s done topped out at level 24.

Stupid human tricks like search.php?keywords=Ratios is the best I can do.

Mike’s out of the earthquake business, but others are requesting things and stuff.

[BeNotDeceived]

1 hr church rumors, are they true?
^{https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 0#p1547070}

It seems every single major decision from the church, in recent memory, has resulted in a net negative. Boy Scout replacement was a failure. Come follow me was a failure. Ministering changes have been a failure. EQ changes have been a failure. The word "Mormon" being evil has been a failure. Temple changes have been a failure.

Now going to a single hour is also going to be a failure. The church is becoming no different from any other church, yet they claim doctrinal superiority and being led directly by God. They are just making stuff up at this point. Always a tweak here and a tweak there. Either God is really having fun with "his church" or maybe they are not led by God as they think they are.

Disagree with you.

Ain’t he the one that said the timing and magnitude of an earthquake could be photoshopped (faked) then vanished into cosmos never to be heard from again? Taki pulled a similar stunt …

[High Spy]

Poll: Repeat a 5.7 magnitude earthquake or continue via 8.9 … ?
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 6#p1550606

One part of Alaska has been getting several strong quakes since yesterday- very possible a volcano erupted.... 2 6.2 quakes is amazing!
One in AK the other in Panama …

5.7
93 km SSE of Adak, Alaska
2025-03-21 08:58:26 (UTC-06:00)
18.5 km
6.2
84 km SSE of Adak, Alaska
2025-03-21 08:53:42 (UTC-06:00)
26.0 km
6.2
123 km SSE of Burica, Panama
2025-03-21 08:50:51 (UTC-06:00)
10.0 km

5.7 followed by two 6.2 on the last day to vote.

Yours truly is 62 having been born in 62 having just realized the beauty of base 62.

[BeNotDeceived]

Re: My Introduction ....
^{https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 9#p1551639}

Perhaps you could enlighten us to the probability of an earthquake of sufficient magnitude to dislodge Moroni’s instrument occurring at exactly 9 minutes after the hour on March 18th 2020 excluding any other minute.

The probability is so low, it is practically zero.
As soon as I heard about that, the Spirit immediately told me it was God's sign that he wasn't happy with the church shutdown. I didn't even have to think about it.
When I talked to family members from the valley about it later, the fact that it didn't even register in their minds that it could be a sign from God, showed me how bad the mind-fog is among church members along the Wasatch Front. Their apparent lack of awareness was startling, and a literal fulfillment of Book of Mormon prophecies about our people who would no longer be impressed by the signs of the times.

Affirmative, the denominator is the number of minutes comprising the time interval between strong earthquakes in the Salt Lake Valley. The numerator is the number of ways to spell Christ, Crist or Cryst using timing patterns like those shown at March8Miracle.org. Finally someone with the mathematical brainpower to understand things correctly.