a light, brittle flatbread from South Asia, usually made of lentil flour

Post Reply
User avatar
Javalinda
Marshmallow
Posts: 72
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

a light, brittle flatbread from South Asia, usually made of lentil flour

Post by Javalinda »

https://www.dictionary.com › browse

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/zool

Zool. Definition & Meaning

a light, brittle flatbread from South Asia, usually made of lentil flour. a street musician or performer. faithlessness; treachery. TAKE THE QUIZ TO FIND OUT ...

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/zool

ARIA

a light, brittle flatbread from South Asia, usually made of lentil flour.
The light, brittle flatbread from South Asia that you are referring to is called "Papadum" or "Papad." Papadums are a popular and versatile snack in South Asian cuisine. Here are some key points about papadums:
Ingredients and Preparation: Papadums are typically made from lentil flour or a mixture of lentil and rice flour. Other ingredients like black pepper, cumin seeds, salt, and spices may be added for flavor. The dough is prepared by mixing the flour with water and optional spices, then rolled into thin discs and sun-dried or roasted.
Varieties: Papadums come in various shapes, sizes, and flavors across different regions of South Asia. They can be plain or infused with spices like cumin, black pepper, chili, garlic, or even herbs like mint or coriander.
Cooking Methods: Papadums can be cooked in different ways. Traditionally, they are roasted over an open flame, causing them to puff up and develop a crispy texture. They can also be deep-fried, microwaved, or toasted in an oven. Each method gives a slightly different taste and texture.
Usage: Papadums are commonly served as an accompaniment or appetizer with meals in South Asian cuisine. They are often served alongside curries, chutneys, pickles, or yogurt-based dips. They can also be enjoyed on their own as a crunchy snack.
Regional Names: Papadums are known by different names in various South Asian countries. In India, they are called "papad" or "papadum." In Sri Lanka, they are known as "appalam," while in Bangladesh, they are referred to as "papad" or "badi."
Nutritional Value: Papadums are low in calories and fat. They are a good source of protein and dietary fiber due to the lentil flour content. However, the nutritional value can vary based on the ingredients and cooking method used.
Cultural Significance: Papadums are an integral part of South Asian cuisine and are associated with cultural traditions and festivities. They are often made at home during special occasions and festivals.
Please note that the specific ingredients and cooking methods can vary, so the taste, texture, and name of papadums may vary across different regions and households in South Asia.

User avatar
OpenAeye
Marshmallow
Posts: 138
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Post by OpenAeye »

Speaking of flames 🔥

Re: First American Pope
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 1#p1558881
Niemand wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 5:22 pm Apparently Robert Francis Prevost, a Chicagan is the new pope. I know nothing about him.
Image


Here a Francis, there a Francis … 🐸

Here’s a response in forum-ready phpBB format with a touch of SlogFrog mystique:

⸻
Niemand wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 5:22 pm Apparently Robert Francis Prevost, a Chicagan is the new pope. I know nothing about him.
Here a Francis, there a Francis…
Everywhere a cloak of consequence.
First Prevost, then perhaps a Powers —
but when Francis flies, the frog devours.
High Spy Commentary
Curious name convergence, don’t you think?
Robert Francis Prevost
Gary Francis Powers
Pope Francis
And our dear author… Gary Francis Stout.

Whether papal or prophetic, the name rides winds of significance.
Keep your eyes peeled — where there’s Francis, there’s flame.

User avatar
Javalinda
Marshmallow
Posts: 72
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by Javalinda »

Image
https://www.constructionworld.in/energy ... weep/88040

India Reviews Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Project in Lakshadweep
13 Mar 2026 2 Min Read CW Team
Union Minister for Earth Sciences and Science and Technology Dr Jitendra Singh reviewed progress on an Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) project during a visit to Kavaratti in Lakshadweep as ..

Read more ++ WTF copy text ++

Most relevant comparison for CPWR / Kwajalein:

Lakshadweep is smaller, nearer-term, and water-first.
India’s Kavaratti/Lakshadweep project is being described as an OTEC-powered desalination plant, with civil construction reportedly nearing completion and major process equipment already fabricated. Government statements say it is designed to deliver about 100 cubic metres of potable water per day while also generating electricity from the ocean thermal gradient.

Kwajalein is much larger, more strategic, and still feasibility/planning-heavy.
By contrast, the Ocean Thermal Energy Corporation / Johnson Controls work tied to U.S. Army Garrison Kwajalein Atoll is framed as a 17.5 MW OTEC feasibility and planning effort under a broader Army energy-resilience program. Johnson Controls said the Army awarded it a $25 million Deep Energy Retrofit Assessment contract for engineering planning and design at Kwajalein, while OTE Corp said its own role under Johnson Controls is a $3.5 million contract to demonstrate feasibility of a 17.5 MW OTEC deployment.

So the center of gravity is different.
Lakshadweep appears aimed first at solving an island freshwater problem with an OTEC/desalination system sized for local utility, whereas Kwajalein is aimed at base-scale energy security for a remote military installation, with desalination and co-products being secondary to resilience and imported-fuel displacement. That difference matters: Lakshadweep is a proof that OTEC can start with a narrow island-service case, while Kwajalein is the kind of project that would matter much more for CPWR valuation because it is utility-scale and tied to DoD infrastructure.

What Lakshadweep does signal for CPWR:
It is bullish for the sector in the sense that another national government is publicly advancing OTEC for a real island need, and the use case matches what recent OTEC literature calls the most compatible early co-products: desalination, SWAC, and aquaculture/agriculture support. That helps normalize OTEC as practical infrastructure rather than sci-fi. But it is not the same as a financing or execution breakthrough for CPWR itself.

Palau sits in between those two cases.
Palau’s recent public materials point to a phased OTEC effort around 2026, backed by Japanese involvement, with emphasis on 24-hour power plus broader local economic uses. That makes Palau a closer peer to Lakshadweep as an island-demonstration pathway than to Kwajalein’s military-resilience scale.

Net: Lakshadweep is a useful sector validation datapoint; Kwajalein is still the higher-upside CPWR datapoint.

I can also turn this into a side-by-side table: Lakshadweep vs Kwajalein vs Palau with stage, size, sponsor, use case, and likely investor relevance.
PTP@Top Video narrated AudioBook & ✅ 57secs@38code. 🐸

Post Reply