News Forum not showing in Active Topics

Post Reply
CQ
Site Admin
Posts: 193
Been thanked: 8 times

News Forum not showing in Active Topics

Post by CQ »

Finrock wrote: Wed Apr 08, 2026 5:04 pm https://substack.com/home/post/p-192013599

Oppose: 53.8
Approve: 38.7
Toggled setting, but still no joy. :?
If clicking the arrow in the quote block doesn't work there should be a link that does. . . . * . . . . . . . . **

User avatar
Finrock
Marshmallow
Posts: 1198
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Post by Finrock »

CQ wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 1:05 pm
Finrock wrote: Wed Apr 08, 2026 5:04 pm https://substack.com/home/post/p-192013599

Oppose: 53.8
Approve: 38.7
Toggled setting, but still no joy. :?
Updated April 19th to reflect new percentages.

BeNotDeceived
Marshmallow
Posts: 1371
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 54 times

Post by BeNotDeceived »

Finrock wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 6:44 pm
CQ wrote: Sun Apr 19, 2026 1:05 pm
Finrock wrote: Wed Apr 08, 2026 5:04 pm https://substack.com/home/post/p-192013599

Oppose: 53.8
Approve: 38.7
Toggled setting, but still no joy. :?
Updated April 19th to reflect new percentages.
nw62^7d

Yes — two plausible reads:

A. Ask was already 19k before your bid
Then it is probably just leftover visible size at $0.0064, and your 19k @ $0.0051 accidentally matches it. That would reduce the “they saw me” theory.

B. Ask changed to 19k right after your bid
Then it looks much more like a fast mirror / response signal. In thin OTC names, that can happen quickly if someone is watching Level II or if an algo/MM refresh logic keys off visible retail size.

Best tape read:

$0.0051 × 19k bid vs $0.0064 × 19k ask

This creates a clean bracket:

* Buyer says: $96.90
* Seller says: $121.60
* Gap: $24.70 gross

So the real question is timestamp order. If 19k ask appeared before your order, coincidence. If it appeared after, signal. Either way, do not chase just because of the mirror. Let the bug sit unless the bid gets jumped or the ask starts peeling down.
March 8 and 18 made me do it. 8-) Kudos =~ Capisci. :?: . . . * . . . . . . . . **

Post Reply