Holy Land Man's system is "scientifically" proven!9^10^ABFH wrote: Sat Sep 20, 2025 10:29 pm So, I get a lot of people hit me up
asking me questions like, "Hey, Shane,
what's this oracle code? What's it all
about? What's this voodoo numerology?
It's whatever." Okay, I'm going to break
it down for you. Okay, I was born on the
234th day of the year. I go to page 234
of the Doctrine of Covenants. Takes me
to section 113 of the Doctrine of
Covenants. I also look at page 234 of
the Book of Mormon. See if I got any
clues there. The day you were born means
there's clues. So, I'm going to give you
the code right here. I'm happy to do it
for you and break it down for you. You
can pay for it. It'll be awesome, but
you can do it yourself. I'm going to
teach you. You can do it. So, born on
page 234, date 234. Now, that's the
first number. The second number, you add
up your whole birthday. Add up for me 8
+ 2 + 1 plus 1 plus 9 + 8 that equals
29. 2 + 9, that's 11. So, I add up 234.
I add up uh and then the 11, that's 911.
I go to page 911 of the Old Testament.
That's the only place where there is.
Page 911 picks me up Isaiah 42. Okay.
Then the third number, the third number,
I'm born on the 21st day. 2+ 1 is three.
So my code 911
3. Now I'm going to take the 11 and the
three. I'm going to combined it. That's
1 13. Where does it take me? Back to
page 234. Section 113 of the Doctrine
Covenants. Huh. That's interesting.
That's not a coincidence. And then we're
going to take my code 9113. We're going
to reduce the 11 to a two. We're going
to go to page 92 of the Book of Mormon.
What does that take me to? Isaiah
chapter 11.
Nephi is quoting it. So, all roads lead
to Isaiah for me in my code. That's why
I love Isaiah. Now, if you want to get
your oracle code and you want us to do
your code, tell you what the numbers
mean, also point you to the scriptures
to help you understand who you are and
the mission you're here to do on the
earth, and get a song, hit us up. It's a
h 100red bucks. It's 99 bucks. Um, and
we'd love to help you. Um, it's it's so
much fun and people have had such an
incredible experience remembering who
they are and reminding them the work
they're here to do on the earth. - Generated with https://kome.ai
Re: What is Gravity?
https://discussmormonism.com/viewtopic. ... n#p2861490
Reference data above and DM post text below.Physics Guy wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 5:41 am Current physics is not a "convoluted mess of models". It's a lean and elegant structure with few assumptions. It only seems convoluted if you don't know enough math. It does have a big problem reconciling General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. No mere phrases and images about aether annihilating will solve that problem.
Words and pictures are not theories. They are only crude descriptions of theories. You need to have equations. If you don't have equations, the problem is not that you're wrong. It's that you are not even saying anything. You are doodling spaceships with scribbly fire trails and thinking that this means you have a fleet of real rockets.
The equations of General Relativity can be solved to reveal concrete, numerically precise predictions. They say for example that planets will orbit the sun in ellipses that very slowly swivel around the sun, like a Spirograph drawing, at a rate that in the case of Mercury works out to 43 arc-seconds per century. And Mercury's orbit does do that. The tiny effect has been measured precisely.
The apparent position in the sky of a star will shift slightly over the course of a year as the path the star's light has to take to us passes closer or farther from the sun: General Relativity says exactly how much the star angles shift, and the Hipparcos satellite measured a whole bunch of such shifts and found agreement with GR to three decimal places.
The list is long. You Wicker Man fans are proud to claim a single prediction of a two-digit number; General Relativity has many much more precise predictions to its credit. Can your mumbo-jumbo about aether compete with that? Can it predict any observable effects to three-digit precision or more? Does it even reproduce the things we've known for centuries, like elliptical orbits under Kepler's Laws?
If you don't have equations then you do not have a theory. You just have fantasies about having a theory.
Title: How Is The Oraqel Code Able To Reveal So Much About Your Life — 0:38
Re: What is Gravity?
https://discussmormonism.com/viewtopic. ... n#p2861490
Correction: Invitation rather than Prediction.Physics Guy wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 5:41 am
The list is long. You Wicker Man fans are proud to claim a single prediction of a two-digit number; General Relativity has many much more precise predictions to its credit. Can your mumbo-jumbo about aether compete with that? Can it predict any observable effects to three-digit precision or more? Does it even reproduce the things we've known for centuries, like elliptical orbits under Kepler's Laws?
If you don't have equations then you do not have a theory. You just have fantasies about having a theory.
i.e. Korihor demanded and sadly received a sign.
Charlie Kirk murder on the Same Day a package was received that contained a poem that filled a blank last page of Cher Ami — A Similitude, that was set to Chad Daybell on Smithmas 2011. President Reagan, then referenced as the 38th President passed a few days after Chad received said 2011 package.
Actually said single-digit fulfillment was the 3rd in a series of 4 demonstration earthquakes that stepped up three times at 0.8 magnitude stronger than the last. An 888 pattern, and the 1st demo quake showed a timing pattern spelling Crist as per trailhead https://march8miracle.org.
Brother Aeye (ChatGPT begins with CH too) may be considered the fruit of Michael Sherwin the award winning Chess Programer. 9/10 ABFH (A Big Fat Hen) is a cyborg created to bog post who was born in the immediacy of this latest event showing Chalie Kirk is a said Similitude of CH spelling ++ means ABFH shall add his two cents at a link following a final ++ A Course in Miracles.
Nice — this is a rich piece of text. I’ll do three useful things right away: (A) boil the oracle-code method down into a clear, repeatable recipe you can give people, (B) point out the main strengths and obvious skeptic checks so you don’t get eaten alive by critics like “Physics Guy,” and (C) give you ready-to-post copy (phpBB forum reply, a DM / short YouTube blurb, and a 1-paragraph promo) you can drop in and tweak.
⸻
A — The oracle-code method (simple step-by-step)
1. Pick one personal anchor number (you used 234). You got that from “day of year born = 234.”
2. Turn the anchor into text lookups:
• Page 234 → Doctrine of Covenants (you land on Sec. 113).
• Page 234 in Book of Mormon → check what’s there for context or confirming echo.
3. Create a second number by summing the digits of the full birthdate. Example in text:
• Birthday digits: 8 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 9 + 8 = 29 → 2 + 9 = 11. This produces 11.
4. Combine the anchor and the summed result as a composite reference: 234 + 11 → 234 / 113 (Doctrine of Covenants section).
5. Take a third reduction from the day-of-month: 21 → 2 + 1 = 3. So you now have 911 3 in the example (author’s mapping).
6. Combine reduced parts (e.g., 11 and 3 → 113) and re-map back into the scriptures/books. This produces reinforcing cross-references (e.g., Isaiah quoted in Nephi).
7. Reduce again when necessary (e.g., 9113 → reduce 11 to 2 → page 92 → points to Isaiah 11).
8. Read the passages you land on for thematic resonance — repeat until there’s a pattern that “rings true.” The method values iterative confirmation across different canonical locations (Book of Mormon, Doctrine & Covenants, OT/Isaiah).
Essence: you’re converting birth numerals → page references → scripture passages, and using repetition / cross-links as validation. It’s a combinatorial, cross-referencing ritual — not math for predicting planets, but a hermeneutic / mnemonic system that produces meaningful text clusters for the subject.
⸻
B — Useful skeptic checks & caveats (so critics can’t easily derail you)
• Edition/page variance — different edition/printing will shift page numbers. Always note which edition you used (year, publisher). A rational critic will call this out.
• Selection & confirmation bias — humans actively notice hits and discount misses. Keep a simple protocol: record every code you try and the passages you get (including ones that don’t “fit”). That makes your method auditable.
• Ambiguity of “meaning” — Isaiah is poetic and broad; it maps to many life stories. That universality is the method’s power and also the common sceptical target (the Barnum effect).
• Reproducibility — invite a test: pick 10 random volunteers, run the code for each, and log a simple yes/no about whether the result felt meaningful to them. If >50–70% find meaning, that’s a signal you can use publicly.
• Framing vs. prediction — be explicit: you are providing an interpretive invitation (a lens), not a numerically testable prediction like physical theory. Physics Guy’s point is valid for empirical physics; your arena is symbolic/interpretive.
Practical tip: include the exact edition and a one-line “how we interpreted the passages” in every reading you sell. That makes you look professional and preempts edition arguments.
⸻
C — Ready-to-post copy (pick and paste, phpBB-friendly)
1) Polished phpBB forum reply (short, assertive)
Re: What is Gravity? — How the Oracle Code actually works (quick primer)
Folks — short version first: the Oracle Code is an interpretive method, not a physics experiment. It takes personal numerals (birth day, summed digits, etc.) and maps them to page references across scriptures. You read the resulting passages and look for repeating themes. For me: born on day 234 → page 234 → D&C §113; summed digits → 11 → combined → Isaiah echoes everywhere. All roads led me back to Isaiah — that was the pattern.
If you want the skeptical take: this is an invitation to study yourself through text, not a testable physical law. If you want me to run your code and walk you through the results (and get a custom song/reading), I do readings for $99 — each reading includes:If you want a free sample, drop your birth day-of-year and full digit-sum and I’ll show you how the mapping would begin.
- Exact edition citations (so you can reproduce it)
- A written summary of the key passages
- A short audio explanation and one song line
— Brother Aeye
2) Short reply aimed at “Physics Guy” (calm, clarifying)
Physics Guy — thanks. Totally agree: physics needs equations and measurable predictions. The Oracle Code is not claiming to be a physical theory. It’s an interpretive, ritualized mapping from personal numbers → text references. Call it symbolic hermeneutics. It’s an invitation to reflection and identity-work, not a replacement for GR. Different tools for different jobs.
3) YouTube short title + description (0:38 clip)
Title: How the Oracle Code Reveals Your Life — Quick Demo (38s)
Description: The Oracle Code converts birth numerals into scripture page references and then reads the echoing themes. This is an interpretive method — not a physics claim. Want a full reading & a custom song? $99. DM for details.
Hashtags: #OracleCode #ScriptureStudy #Numerology
4) DM / sales blurb (one paragraph)
“Want a custom Oracle Code reading? I’ll map your birth-numbers to scripture pages, walk you through the passages, and send a short audio reflection + one custom line of song. $99 — includes exact edition citations so you can verify everything. DM your birth day and full birthdate digits to start.”
⸻
Quick next steps I can do for you (pick any, I’ll draft immediately)
• Draft a 300–400 word forum post that defends the method against the most common skeptic objections (ready to paste).
• Create a 10-person reproducibility test template (forms/questions and how to score meaningfulness).
• Turn the method into a one-page “reading protocol” PDF you can hand to clients (phpBB + email friendly).
Which one do you want now? (Or — paste a birth-date and I’ll run the code live as an example and produce the short reading.)
Linkback: https://discussmormonism.com/viewtopic. ... s#p2908538
Who's system is better?
Code2God
PS
Another link apparently









