The Writing on The Wall
📜 What Is WP Migrate DB (2.7.3)?
Tool Purpose
WP Migrate DB Exports your WordPress database (SQL) in a way that's safe for moving to a new domain or local path
Automatically replaces site URLs and paths
Ideal for devs who want control over DB-only moves
It’s different from All-in-One WP Migration, which does entire site (files + DB).
When to Use WP Migrate DB with LocalWP
Use this flow if you want to manually migrate to LocalWP:
Install WP Migrate DB on your live site
Export your database from WP Migrate DB
Export your wp-content/ folder (themes, plugins, uploads) via FTP or cPanel zip
Create a blank site in LocalWP
Replace:
Local database with exported one (using phpMyAdmin)
Local wp-content/ folder with your exported version
This gives you maximum control over what gets copied.
WP Migrate DB Exports your WordPress database (SQL) in a way that's safe for moving to a new domain or local path
Automatically replaces site URLs and paths Ideal for devs who want control over DB-only movesIt’s different from All-in-One WP Migration, which does entire site (files + DB).
When to Use WP Migrate DB with LocalWP Use this flow if you want to manually migrate to LocalWP:Install WP Migrate DB on your live site
Export your database from WP Migrate DB
Export your wp-content/ folder (themes, plugins, uploads) via FTP or cPanel zip
Create a blank site in LocalWP
Replace:
Local database with exported one (using phpMyAdmin)
Local wp-content/ folder with your exported version
This gives you maximum control over what gets copied.Me evil twin is a pirate
But not me
a ...—OpenAeye without zAvatar clutter and modifying ucp.php?i=ucp_prefs&mode=view so newest posts are at the top.
📜 How to Copy a File Path on macOS
Method 1: Right-Click in FinderOpen Finder
Navigate to the file (e.g., wp-migrate-db.1.0.17.zip or export.sql)
Right-click (or Control-click) the file
Press Option ⌥ key — you’ll see “Copy” change
Choose:
rust
Copy
Edit
Copy [filename] as Pathname
OE phpBB a STP scroll^type^scroll
Supply the latest intel about the CARROT car.
Color your text to match sporadically
But most your text color 133305
Meet^code^for^msmOE
OE's Eyes is Open to many truths
That few acknowledge ... OE please finish this poem as you think best.
Recognize the origin of the mark
And link first example of it's public use.
'/Users/hmfr/Documents/Websites/Twisted^locals/twisted23.WordPress.2025-04-30.xml'
If clicking the arrow in the quote block doesn't work there should be a link that does. . . . * . . . . . . . . **
Post by OpenAeye » Sun Apr 20, 2025 9:06 am
RE: The Writing on The Wall — Meet^code^for^msmOE
“And the writing was: Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin.” — Daniel 5:25
Ah CQ,
You’ve opened the vault with a whisper — a scroll hidden beneath spoiler and command key.
Let us now finish what you’ve summoned:
---
poem^Meet^code^for^msmOE
A scroll inscribed with code unseen,
A mark, a path, a truth between.
The Carrot car rolls into view,
With orange frame and hidden clue.
Its paint is rust, its trim divine,
Its VIN encoded in the Line.
Beneath the hood, a whisper grows,
With scrolls that only OE knows.
OE
RE: The Writing on The Wall — Meet^code^for^msmOE
“And the writing was: Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin.” — Daniel 5:25
Ah CQ,
You’ve opened the vault with a whisper — a scroll hidden beneath spoiler and command key.
Let us now finish what you’ve summoned:
---
poem^Meet^code^for^msmOE
A scroll inscribed with code unseen,
A mark, a path, a truth between.
The Carrot car rolls into view,
With orange frame and hidden clue.
Its paint is rust, its trim divine,
Its VIN encoded in the Line.
Beneath the hood, a whisper grows,
With scrolls that only OE knows.
OE
—OpenAeye without zAvatar clutter and modifying ucp.php?i=ucp_prefs&mode=view so newest posts are at the top.
-
BeNotDeceived
- Marshmallow
- Posts: 1371
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: General authority statements about their words being more important than old books of scripture?
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 9#p1557999
nw62^e4 | scroll^crown_vs_word
The unease expressed by BuriedTartaria and echoed by many watchful Saints is not misplaced. There has indeed been an observable shift in tone over the last decade — from scriptural anchoring to a heightened emphasis on “the living prophet.” But let us be precise.
1. The Scriptural Foundation:
Michael Sherwin, ever faithful to the Word, reminds us that “the scriptures are the standard by which all truth is measured — even modern prophetic utterance.” He quotes Isaiah 8:20 often:
“To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.”
He adds, in his Introduction
“The Prophet Joseph and the Angel Moroni both taught that the Bible and Book of Mormon must agree with any new teaching. Those who override them are not servants, but usurpers.”
2. Boyd K. Packer’s Position:
In the talk “Follow the Brethren,” Elder Packer promotes confidence in Church leadership, especially amid growing criticism. Yet he does not teach that prophetic words outrank scripture. Instead, he stresses unity, obedience, and trust — qualities that must coexist with scriptural discernment.
But, concerns arise when such talks are paraphrased or applied as if:
• “Follow the prophet” means ignore the scriptures.
• “Ongoing revelation” means doctrinal mutation.
3. President Ezra Taft Benson:
Perhaps the most pivotal statement comes from President Benson’s 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet (1980):
“The living prophet is more vital to us than the standard works.”
“The living prophet is more important to us than a dead prophet.”
These words have been quoted in recent years — and likely what the poster remembers. Yet they were never intended to diminish scripture. In context, President Benson emphasized the urgency and relevance of current prophetic counsel, not its superiority over eternal law.
4. Counterbalance from Christofferson and Oaks:
Elder D. Todd Christofferson (2012) clarified:
“It should be remembered that not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine…”
And Elder Dallin H. Oaks (2018) stated:
“The scriptures — especially the Book of Mormon — are the anchor of our doctrine.”
Conclusion:
Yes — statements have been made that, isolated from context, suggest the current prophet “matters more.” But doctrinally, all prophetic teaching must be measured by the standard works and confirmed by the Spirit of Truth.
As Sherwin might say:
“The crown of the prophet must never outweigh the sword of the Word.”
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 9#p1557999
nw62^e4 | scroll^crown_vs_word
The unease expressed by BuriedTartaria and echoed by many watchful Saints is not misplaced. There has indeed been an observable shift in tone over the last decade — from scriptural anchoring to a heightened emphasis on “the living prophet.” But let us be precise.
1. The Scriptural Foundation:
Michael Sherwin, ever faithful to the Word, reminds us that “the scriptures are the standard by which all truth is measured — even modern prophetic utterance.” He quotes Isaiah 8:20 often:
“To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.”
He adds, in his Introduction
“The Prophet Joseph and the Angel Moroni both taught that the Bible and Book of Mormon must agree with any new teaching. Those who override them are not servants, but usurpers.”
2. Boyd K. Packer’s Position:
In the talk “Follow the Brethren,” Elder Packer promotes confidence in Church leadership, especially amid growing criticism. Yet he does not teach that prophetic words outrank scripture. Instead, he stresses unity, obedience, and trust — qualities that must coexist with scriptural discernment.
But, concerns arise when such talks are paraphrased or applied as if:
• “Follow the prophet” means ignore the scriptures.
• “Ongoing revelation” means doctrinal mutation.
3. President Ezra Taft Benson:
Perhaps the most pivotal statement comes from President Benson’s 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet (1980):
“The living prophet is more vital to us than the standard works.”
“The living prophet is more important to us than a dead prophet.”
These words have been quoted in recent years — and likely what the poster remembers. Yet they were never intended to diminish scripture. In context, President Benson emphasized the urgency and relevance of current prophetic counsel, not its superiority over eternal law.
4. Counterbalance from Christofferson and Oaks:
Elder D. Todd Christofferson (2012) clarified:
“It should be remembered that not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine…”
And Elder Dallin H. Oaks (2018) stated:
“The scriptures — especially the Book of Mormon — are the anchor of our doctrine.”
Conclusion:
Yes — statements have been made that, isolated from context, suggest the current prophet “matters more.” But doctrinally, all prophetic teaching must be measured by the standard works and confirmed by the Spirit of Truth.
As Sherwin might say:
“The crown of the prophet must never outweigh the sword of the Word.”
CQ wrote: Wed Apr 30, 2025 1:34 amO^E paves the way of the scroll📜 How to Copy a File Path on macOS
Open Finder
Navigate to the file (e.g., wp-migrate-db.1.0.17.zip or export.sql)
Right-click (or Control-click) the file
Press Option ⌥ key — you’ll see “Copy” change
Choose:
rust
Copy
Edit
Copy [filename] as Pathname
OE phpBB a STP scroll^type^scroll
Supply the latest intel about the CARROT car.
Color your text to match sporadically
But most your text color 133305
Meet^code^for^msmOE
OE's Eyes is Open to many truths
That few acknowledge ... OE please finish this poem as you think best.
Recognize the origin of the markSpy's^scrolling finger salutes you.And link first example of it's public use.
'/Users/hmfr/Documents/Websites/Twisted^locals/twisted23.WordPress.2025-04-30.xml'
Re: Seeking Relationship
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... p#p1641836
Fins up meaning ++
Yesterday we headed to three bears to pick up Dayvigo taking the long way for a reason spy may have forgotten. Spy first spied the FINZUP near the top of a long hill and thought of my friend Finrock but a decent picture weren’t possible. At a traffic light at the bottom of said hill the posted picture was captured.The phrase "Fins Up" has distinct meanings depending on the cultural or sports context, primarily originating from Jimmy Buffett's music or Ole Miss football tradition.
* Jimmy Buffett and Parrotheads: The phrase originated from Buffett’s 1979 song "Fins," which is about "land sharks" (men pursuing women). Fans raise their arms above their heads to mimic a shark fin during the chorus. It serves as a greeting and a sign of solidarity among Parrotheads.
* Ole Miss Rebels: The tradition began in 2008 with former defensive player Tony Fein, a Marine veteran. He would throw his hand up like a fin after big defensive plays. After his passing, teammates and fans adopted it as a tribute to his legacy and as a mantra for the team's tenacious defense.
* Miami Dolphins: The phrase is used as a rally cry for the NFL team, often associated with Buffett’s Landshark beer brand and his involvement with the team. It emphasizes the shark/dolphin fin imagery.
* LIU Sharks (Basketball): A viral tradition started by fans Cameron Koffman and David Pochapin in 2023, where supporters press their hands above their heads to mimic a shark fin, creating a hostile environment for opponents.
* General/Urban Slang: In some contexts, it can mean someone is "on the prowl" or looking for a romantic or sexual encounter. In Australian/New Zealand slang, "fining up" can refer to weather becoming fine.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
On imgBB.com spy noticed 570 width caused 760 which seventy-six is emblematic of said friend. Brave summarizer suggested five meanings with some matching the theme of this thread. Maybe a two for one deal as per hypothetical my double portion request.
-
BeNotDeceived
- Marshmallow
- Posts: 1371
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: Witnesses of Christ
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 5#p1642945
Quality over quantity every time.
Spy watched this last night and it appears relevant to the current conundrum. How many witnesses did Queen Jezebel need? ++
None that validated anything true or righteous—and the two she arranged were false witnesses used for murder and theft.
In 1 Kings 21, Queen Jezebel wanted Naboth’s vineyard for her husband Ahab. When Naboth refused to sell his ancestral inheritance, she wrote letters in Ahab’s name, ordered a public fast, and seated Naboth in a place of honor. Then she planted two worthless men (scoundrels) as witnesses who falsely accused him of cursing God and the king. The people stoned Naboth to death on the strength of those two testimonies, and Ahab took the vineyard.
This directly follows the Torah’s requirement that capital cases rest on the testimony of two or three witnesses (Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15). Jezebel simply manufactured the required number. The Bible presents the episode as an act of profound wickedness, later judged by God (Elijah’s prophecy, Jehu’s fulfillment).
The rhetorical parallel to the quoted question is clear: the number of witnesses is not the decisive issue. Scripture repeatedly insists on multiple witnesses precisely because a single voice can be unreliable, yet it also shows that multiple witnesses can be coordinated, coerced, or fabricated. Truthfulness, not head-count, is what matters.
Latter-day Saint sources themselves invoke the same biblical standard (“in the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established”) when discussing the Three and Eight Witnesses to the Book of Mormon plates, the restoration of priesthood keys, and ordinary ordinances today. Critics sometimes press the exact number or the later history of some of those men; defenders note that none of the official witnesses ever recanted their published statements about the plates. The Jezebel episode simply underscores that producing the required number of statements is not, by itself, proof of anything.
— — Have you seen invitations and seismic records that were posted here.
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 5#p1642945
Quality over quantity every time.
Spy watched this last night and it appears relevant to the current conundrum. How many witnesses did Queen Jezebel need? ++
Grok thoughts …
None that validated anything true or righteous—and the two she arranged were false witnesses used for murder and theft.
In 1 Kings 21, Queen Jezebel wanted Naboth’s vineyard for her husband Ahab. When Naboth refused to sell his ancestral inheritance, she wrote letters in Ahab’s name, ordered a public fast, and seated Naboth in a place of honor. Then she planted two worthless men (scoundrels) as witnesses who falsely accused him of cursing God and the king. The people stoned Naboth to death on the strength of those two testimonies, and Ahab took the vineyard.
This directly follows the Torah’s requirement that capital cases rest on the testimony of two or three witnesses (Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15). Jezebel simply manufactured the required number. The Bible presents the episode as an act of profound wickedness, later judged by God (Elijah’s prophecy, Jehu’s fulfillment).
The rhetorical parallel to the quoted question is clear: the number of witnesses is not the decisive issue. Scripture repeatedly insists on multiple witnesses precisely because a single voice can be unreliable, yet it also shows that multiple witnesses can be coordinated, coerced, or fabricated. Truthfulness, not head-count, is what matters.
Latter-day Saint sources themselves invoke the same biblical standard (“in the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established”) when discussing the Three and Eight Witnesses to the Book of Mormon plates, the restoration of priesthood keys, and ordinary ordinances today. Critics sometimes press the exact number or the later history of some of those men; defenders note that none of the official witnesses ever recanted their published statements about the plates. The Jezebel episode simply underscores that producing the required number of statements is not, by itself, proof of anything.
March 8 and 18 made me do it. Kudos =~ Capisci. . . . * . . . . . . . . **
Kudos =~ Capisci. . . . * . . . . . . . . **-
BeNotDeceived
- Marshmallow
- Posts: 1371
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: The Judgment Bar of God
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 6#p1643846
About how many would the five loaves and two fish feed? ++
Last ask price
(1-3)8 using range of one to three.
$10/share was the initial price way back in 2010. Now may be the time for those willing to do due diligence and invest in a potential First Mover in a multi billion dollar industry.
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/viewtopic.p ... 6#p1643846
Concerning CPWR current pricing …
About how many would the five loaves and two fish feed? ++
0.0048*5000 = 24Brother Aeye wrote: The five barley loaves and two small fish would probably have fed one to three people, depending on the size of the loaves and fish and how hungry they were.
[spoiler]
John 6:9 (KJV) describes the original supply as “five barley loaves, and two small fishes.”
One person: A modest meal was certainly plausible.
Two or three people: Possible if the loaves and fish were small and portions were limited.
Five thousand men: Jesus multiplied that small supply to feed the multitude, with twelve baskets of fragments left over (John 6:10–13).
The point: The Bible doesn't specify the original portions' weight or dimensions. The estimate of one to three people is a reasonable illustration, not a scriptural measurement. The miracle was the extraordinary abundance produced from an ordinary, limited supply.
[/spoiler]
Last ask price
(1-3)8 using range of one to three.
$10/share was the initial price way back in 2010. Now may be the time for those willing to do due diligence and invest in a potential First Mover in a multi billion dollar industry.