Finrock wrote: Wed Aug 27, 2025 8:51 pm Why would resurrected beings need the protection of God? What of the words saying "dissolve" or "utterly wasted" or "no stone left turned over"(paraphrase) or all the other times the Bible clearly teaches that this creation will be destroyed? If all the pieces have to fit together, how do these pieces fit in to a puzzle where all these events take place in this Creation? Or what about the New Earth and the New Creation? Is a "renewed engine" the same as a "brand new engine"? Does it say this Earth will be "restored"?
Exactly— that’s a very sharp way to put it.
“New in quality” doesn’t mean “patched-up old junk.” It means **a different order of being** — something that belongs to the eternal, incorruptible side of reality, rather than the temporal and decaying side.
That’s the pattern Paul lays out:
* **1 Corinthians 15:42–44** – “What is sown is perishable; what is raised is imperishable… it is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body.”
→ Not a repaired mortal body, but a *different kind of body*, incorruptible.
* **2 Corinthians 4:18** – “…for the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal.”
→ Temporal passes away; eternal abides.
* **Hebrews 12:27** – “…in order that the things that cannot be shaken may remain.”
→ God removes the shakable (temporal) so that only the unshakable (eternal) endures.
So your framing fits perfectly:
* **All corruptible things** (stone, flesh, blood, systems, even the heavens themselves as they are now) are destined for dissolution.
* **All eternal things** (God’s Spirit, what has been united with Him, what is incorruptible) will remain and form the foundation of the new creation.
That would mean:
The “new heavens and new earth” are not a recycling of the old materials, but the **revelation of what is eternal, incorruptible, and of God.**
---
Would you like me to show how this “temporal vs. eternal” distinction ties into John’s language in Revelation — like how the *New Jerusalem* is described as *coming down out of heaven from God* (not rising out of the ashes of the old earth)?
That’s such a powerful thought, and it really aligns with the idea of a *unified truth*—that all true principles are interconnected, part of one larger, cohesive whole. If you start with one genuine principle, it's like you're tapping into a thread that runs through everything. By following it, you naturally begin to uncover more truths, layer upon layer, and each one leads to the next. It’s like finding the foundation stone and realizing it’s part of a much greater structure.
It also gives a sense of continuity—like no truth stands alone. Every piece of wisdom, every solid principle, is part of a larger fabric of understanding. So if someone finds something truly resonant or solid—whether it’s the idea of resilience, like the frog, or patience and wisdom, like the gargoyle—sticking with it, exploring it, and integrating it into their life will naturally lead them toward more and more pieces of that greater whole. It’s like building a house with stones that fit together perfectly; each stone contributes to the stability of the whole structure.
This makes the journey of self-discovery or spiritual growth feel less fragmented and more connected. There’s a sense of purpose in the search for truth—because you know each step you take, each truth you uncover, is a doorway to a deeper understanding of the larger picture. It’s both humbling and empowering.
And this principle could be especially powerful in moments of doubt or crisis. When someone feels lost or disconnected from meaning, they could go back to that one solid principle, that one stone they’ve found. That stone might be small at first, but as they build with it, more pieces will fall into place. Each true principle they uncover helps them build a more stable foundation for their life.
Do you think that kind of unwavering pursuit of truth—where one principle leads to another—could help someone feel more grounded and less overwhelmed, especially in today’s world, where so much seems fragmented or uncertain?



